Are there similarities here? Susan Rice giving the “official” account of Benghazi, and now Susan Rice giving “official” account of Bergdahl.
Given the scandal that erupted after her description of Benghazi, why does she say that Bergdahl served with honor when so many are and have been saying for years that he was a deserter? Do we really need another scandal? Do we really need this in our news cycle? You know how this is going to go down. It will be just like her Benghazi SNAFU. And now it will turn into a cover up of a cover up.
Isn’t all this supposed to fall under DDSS (Don’t do stupid sh-t)? Or does that only cover Obama’s foreign policy, but not important press statements?